Miniaturized thermal purge-and-trap device combined with self-calibration colorimetric/SERS dual-model optical sensors for highly rapid and selective detection of sulfur dioxide in wine.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Integrated Fe(III)-driven liquid-phase microextraction-spectrophotometry for selective and high-throughput detection of ethyl maltol in complex food samples.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026
   Article
2. Sulfur Dioxide in Food: A Review of Its Preservative Mechanisms, Safety Concerns, and the Rise of Smart Detection Systems.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2026
   Review

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

Indexed as