ArticleAnnals of medicine2025
Comparative genetic analysis of blood and semen samples in sperm donors from Hunan, China.
Article in Annals of medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesAt present, most genetic tests or carrier screening are performed with blood samples, and the known carrier rate of disease-causing variants is also derived from blood. For semen donors, what is really passed on to offspring is the pathogenic variant in their sperm. This study aimed to determine whether pathogenic variants identified in the sperm of young semen donors are also present in their blood, and whether matching results for blood are consistent with results for sperm.
methodsWe included 40 paired sperm and blood samples from 40 qualified semen donors at the Hunan Province Human Sperm Bank of China. All samples underwent exome sequencing (ES) analysis, and the pathogenicity was assessed according to the American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) guidelines. Scoring for sperm donation matching, which was based on gene scoring and variant scoring, was also used to assess the consistency of sperm and blood genetic test results.
resultsA total of 108 pathogenic (P)/likely pathogenic (LP) variants in 82 genes were identified. The highest carrier had 7 variants, and there was also one donor did not carry any P/LP variant. On average, each donor carried 2.7 P/LP variants. Among all the P/LP variants, missense mutation was the dominant type and most of them were located in exonic regions. Chromosome 1 harboured the largest number of variants and no pathogenic copy number variants (CNV) was identified in semen donors. The P/LP variant of all the 40 semen donors was consistent by comparing sperm and blood. Except for one case that was slightly different, the rest simulated matching results for blood were all consistent with results for sperm.
conclusionsIt is reasonable to choose either blood or sperm for genetic screening in semen donors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.