ArticleEpidemiology and infection2025
Prospective study of peripartum group B streptococcus colonization in Japanese mothers and neonates.
Article in Epidemiology and infection, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prospective study of peripartum group B streptococcus colonization in Japanese mothers and neonates - ERRATUM.Epidemiology and infection · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Group B streptococcus (GBS) is a major global cause of neonatal, infant, and maternal infections. In Japan, national guidelines based on Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommendations mandate culture-based screening and intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP) for GBS-positive pregnant women. Despite initial reductions in GBS infections, the incidence has plateaued, and there are notable limitations in current prevention methods. Approximately 15% of pregnant women are not screened for GBS, and intermittent colonization undermines screening accuracy, contributing to early-onset disease. IAP does not prevent late-onset disease, the incidence of which is increasing in Japan. This study reviewed maternal and neonatal GBS colonization using polymerase chain reaction, evaluated capsular type distributions, and explored late-onset disease infection routes. Among 525 mother-neonate pairs, the study found a higher detection rate of GBS via polymerase chain reaction compared to culture methods and identified significant discrepancies between antepartum and intrapartum colonization. GBS was detected in 3.5% of neonates from initially negative mothers at 4 days of age. Capsular types varied between mothers and neonates, indicating potential horizontal transmission. This study underscores the need for improved rapid diagnostic tests and highlights the potential of maternal GBS vaccination as a future prevention strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.