Trial reportOrthopaedic surgery2025
Measured Resection as Gap Balance Method in Mobile-Bearing Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Trial report in Orthopaedic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03815448 (A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial of Methotrexate), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial of Methotrexate (MTX) in the Treatment of Advanced Knee Osteoarthritis With Effusion-synovitis
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A narrative review of clinical research on knee osteoarthritis in 2025.Annals of joint · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveGap balancing is a vital process during mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (MB-UKA). However, this process commonly depends on the surgeon's experience and lacks specific unified standards. This study aimed to propose and evaluate a novel "measured resection" method for gap balance in MB-UKA.
methodsThis prospective study included 49 consecutive patients (52 knees) who underwent MB-UKA from February 1, 2023, to September 1, 2023. Gap balance was achieved by the traditional "two-finger" method (Group 1, 26 knees) or the measured resection method (Group 2, 26 knees). The novel "measured resection" method was performed by measuring the thickness of the resected posterior femoral condyle and resected medial posterior tibial plateau to assess proper meniscal bearing thickness. Data were collected at baseline and the 6-month follow-up. Prosthetic angles, range of motion (ROM), visual analog scale (VAS) score, Oxford knee score (OKS), and Global Perceived Scale (GPE) were used to evaluate clinical outcomes. Independent samples t-test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare the differences.
resultsThere were significant improvements in all measured outcomes at the 6-month follow-up from baseline in both groups (p < 0.01). Patients using measured resection method showed better ROM (130° vs. 120°, p = 0.007), VAS score (1 vs. 2, p = 0.013), and OKS scores (39.9 vs. 38.1, p = 0.013) at 6-month follow-up than the traditional "two-finger" method group. The prosthetic angles, ROM improvement, and GPE showed no significant difference between the groups (p > 0.05).
conclusionsThe measured resection method is a reliable method for assisting surgeons in choosing the ideal meniscal bearing thickness in MB-UKA to achieve proper gap balance and gain better clinical outcomes.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03815448).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.