Trial reportAging & mental health2025
Two-year follow-up of dementia caregivers after a digital health intervention WECARE: a mixed-method study.
Trial report in Aging & mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of the mHealth Supportive Care Program for Family Caregivers of Individuals With Dementia and Diabetes: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2026Trial
- Using Group Chats to Drive Behavior Change in Digital Health Interventions: Scoping Review and Realist Synthesis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesFew digital health interventions for dementia caregivers, especially for racial and ethnic minorities, include long-term follow-ups. This study assessed the feasibility of two-year follow-up of the Wellness Enhancement for Caregivers (WECARE) intervention for Chinese American dementia caregivers, examined the changes in psychosocial health and explored future strategies.
methodA mixed-method study was conducted two years after the initial WECARE intervention trial. Participants completed an online survey and phone interviews. Quantitative and qualitative data were analyzed complementarily.
resultsEighteen of 24 participants completed the survey and 15 participated in interviews. Caregivers reported deteriorating conditions of care-recipients and increased caregiving burden, but their depressive symptoms and life satisfaction remained lower compared to baseline. Participants highlighted sustained benefits of WECARE, including stress management, improved communication, and a sense of community through group chats. They expressed a need for ongoing social and information support.
conclusionThis study demonstrates the feasibility of long-term evaluation for digital interventions like WECARE and emphasizes the need for continuous support. Sustained benefits underscore the potential of culturally tailored digital health interventions for underserved dementia caregivers. Future efforts should integrate ongoing resource access to enhance caregivers' long-term well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.