Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39757685›Full record

ArticleCurrent medicinal chemistry2025

Integrated

Ahmed M Metwaly, Esmail M El-Fakharany, Aisha A Alsfouk, Ibrahim M Ibrahim, Eslam B Elkaeed, Ibrahim H Eissa

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current medicinal chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Bioactive Phenolics fromAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ahmed M MetwalyPharmacognosy and Medicinal Plants Department, Faculty of Pharmacy (Boys), Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.
Esmail M El-FakharanyProtein Research Department, Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology Research Institute (GEBRI), City of Scientific Research and Technological Applications (SRTA-City), New Borg El-Arab City, Alexandria, 21934, Egypt.
Aisha A AlsfoukDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, P.O. Box 84428, Riyadh, 11671, Saudi Arabia.
Ibrahim M IbrahimBiophysics Department, Faculty of Science, Cairo University, Cairo, 12613, Egypt.
Eslam B ElkaeedDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, AlMaarefa University, P.O Box 71666, Riyadh, 11597, Saudi Arabia.
Ibrahim H EissaPharmaceutical Medicinal Chemistry & Drug Design Department, Faculty of Pharmacy (Boys), Al-Azhar University, Cairo, 11884, Egypt.

Funding

Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia PNURSP2025R116
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn our quest to identify potent inhibitors against SARS-CoV-2, an extensive investigation was conducted for the binding and inhibitory efficacy of Rutin against nine SARS-CoV-2 proteins.

methodsStructure Similarity, flexible alignment, Molecular Docking, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations and in vitro assays against the RdRp and SARS-CoV-2 have been conducted.

resultsThe first step of our analysis involved a comprehensive examination of structural similarity among the co-crystallized ligands associated with those proteins. A substantial structural similarity was observed between Rutin and Remdesivir, the ligand of the SARS-CoV-2 RNAdependent RNA polymerase (RdRp). This similarity was validated through a flexible alignment study. Molecular docking studies, involving superimposition, revealed a notable resemblance in the mode of binding between Rutin and Remdesivir inside the active site of the RdRp. A 200 ns MD simulation confirmed that the RdRp-Rutin complex is more stable than the RdRp-Remdesivir complex. The MM-GBSA studies showed that Rutin had much more favorable binding energies, with a significantly lower value of -7.76 kcal/mol compared to Remdesivir's -2.15 kcal/mol. This indicates that the RdRp-Rutin binding is more robust and stable. PLIP and ProLIF studies helped clarify the 3D binding interactions and confirmed the stable binding seen in MD simulations. PCAT gave more insights into the dynamic behavior of the RdRp-Rutin complex. In vitro tests showed that Rutin has a strong inhibitory effect on RdRp with an IC50 of 60.09 nM, significantly outperforming Remdesivir, which has an IC50 of 24.56 μM. Remarkably, against SARS-CoV-2, Rutin showed a superior in vitro IC50 of 0.598 μg/ml compared to Remdesivir (12.47 μg/ml). The values of the selectivity index underscored the exceptional margin of safety of Rutin (SI: 1078) compared to Remdesivir (SI: 5.8).

conclusionIn conclusion, our comprehensive analysis indicates Rutin's promising potential as a potent SARS-CoV-2 RdRp inhibitor, providing a valuable insight for developing an effective COVID-19 treatment.

Indexed as

Antiviral AgentsBetacoronavirusRNA-Dependent RNA PolymeraseRutinSARS-CoV-2Adenosine MonophosphateAlanineCOVID-19 Drug TreatmentHumansMolecular Docking SimulationMolecular Dynamics SimulationAdenosine MonophosphateAlanineAntiviral AgentsremdesivirRNA-Dependent RNA PolymeraseRutinin vitroMD SimulationsRdRpritonavir.RutinSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID39757685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.