Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39757669›Full record

ArticleCurrent medical imaging2025

Advanced CNN Architecture for Brain Tumor Segmentation and Classification using BraTS-GOAT 2024 Dataset.

Vaidehi Satushe, Vibha Vyas, Shilpa Metkar, Davinder Paul Singh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Vaidehi SatusheDepartment of Electronics & Telecommunication Engineering, COEP Technological University (COEP Tech), Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Vibha VyasDepartment of Electronics & Telecommunication Engineering, COEP Technological University (COEP Tech), Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Shilpa MetkarDepartment of Electronics & Telecommunication Engineering, COEP Technological University (COEP Tech), Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Davinder Paul SinghDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Pandit Deen Dayal Energy University, Gujarat, Gandhinagar, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe BraTS Generalizability Across Tumors (BraTS-GoAT) initiative addresses the critical need for robust and generalizable models in brain tumor segmentation. Despite advancements in automated segmentation techniques, the variability in tumor characteristics and imaging modalities across clinical settings presents a significant challenge.

objectiveThis study aims to develop an advanced CNN-based model for brain tumor segmentation that enhances consistency and utility across diverse clinical environments. The objective is to improve the generalizability of CNN models by applying them to large-scale datasets and integrating robust preprocessing techniques.

methodsThe proposed approach involves the application of advanced CNN models to the BraTS 2024 challenge dataset, incorporating preprocessing techniques such as standardization, feature extraction, and segmentation. The model's performance was evaluated based on accuracy, mean Intersection over Union (IOU), average Dice coefficient, Hausdorff 95 score, precision, sensitivity, and specificity.

resultsThe model achieved an accuracy of 98.47%, a mean IOU of 0.8185, an average Dice coefficient of 0.7, an average Hausdorff 95 score of 1.66, a precision of 98.55%, a sensitivity of 98.40%, and a specificity of 99.52%. These results demonstrate a significant improvement over the current gold standard in brain tumor segmentation.

conclusionThe findings of this study contribute to establishing benchmarks for generalizability in medical imaging, promoting the adoption of CNN-based brain tumor segmentation models in diverse clinical environments. This work has the potential to improve outcomes for patients with brain tumors by enhancing the reliability and effectiveness of automated segmentation techniques.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeural Networks, ComputerDatabases, FactualHumansSensitivity and SpecificityAGI. ArticleBrain tumorCNNGeneralizabilityMRI

Identifiers

PMID39757669
PMCPMC13096864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.