ArticleCurrent medical imaging2025
Advanced CNN Architecture for Brain Tumor Segmentation and Classification using BraTS-GOAT 2024 Dataset.
Article in Current medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep Learning for Brain Tumour Analysis: A Systematic Review of CNN-Transformer Hybrids in Multimodal Imaging.International journal of biomedical imaging · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence for the Diagnosis and Management of Cancers: Potentials and Challenges.MedComm · 2025Review
- A Review on Deep Learning Methods for Glioma Segmentation, Limitations, and Future Perspectives.Journal of imaging · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe BraTS Generalizability Across Tumors (BraTS-GoAT) initiative addresses the critical need for robust and generalizable models in brain tumor segmentation. Despite advancements in automated segmentation techniques, the variability in tumor characteristics and imaging modalities across clinical settings presents a significant challenge.
objectiveThis study aims to develop an advanced CNN-based model for brain tumor segmentation that enhances consistency and utility across diverse clinical environments. The objective is to improve the generalizability of CNN models by applying them to large-scale datasets and integrating robust preprocessing techniques.
methodsThe proposed approach involves the application of advanced CNN models to the BraTS 2024 challenge dataset, incorporating preprocessing techniques such as standardization, feature extraction, and segmentation. The model's performance was evaluated based on accuracy, mean Intersection over Union (IOU), average Dice coefficient, Hausdorff 95 score, precision, sensitivity, and specificity.
resultsThe model achieved an accuracy of 98.47%, a mean IOU of 0.8185, an average Dice coefficient of 0.7, an average Hausdorff 95 score of 1.66, a precision of 98.55%, a sensitivity of 98.40%, and a specificity of 99.52%. These results demonstrate a significant improvement over the current gold standard in brain tumor segmentation.
conclusionThe findings of this study contribute to establishing benchmarks for generalizability in medical imaging, promoting the adoption of CNN-based brain tumor segmentation models in diverse clinical environments. This work has the potential to improve outcomes for patients with brain tumors by enhancing the reliability and effectiveness of automated segmentation techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.