ArticleCurrent medical imaging2025
A Comparative Study on CT-guided Radiofrequency Ablation and Targeted Therapy: Intervention Efficacy and Survival Rates in Lung Cancer Patients
Article in Current medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Association Between Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Survival in Patients with Lung Cancer: A Nationwide Cohort Study.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe study aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy of CT-guided radiofrequency ablation in conjunction with targeted therapy in lung cancer patients.
methodWe retrospectively analyzed 80 lung cancer patients. They were stratified into the Observation Group (OG, n=40, treated with CT-guided radiofrequency ablation in conjunction with targeted therapy) and the Control Group (CG, n=40, treated solely with targeted therapy).
resultsThe OG group reported 4 cases of Complete Response (CR), 24 cases of Partial Response (PR), 10 cases of Stable Disease (SD), and 2 cases of Progressive Disease (PD). The Overall Response Rate (ORR) was 70.00% (28/40), and the Disease Control Rate (DCR) was 95.00% (38/40). In contrast, the CG group exhibited 3 cases of CR, 20 cases of PR, 12 cases of SD, and 5 cases of PD. The ORR was 57.50% (23/40), and the DCR was 87.50% (35/40). The ORR and DCR in the OG group were significantly higher than those in the CG group. After 6 weeks of treatment, the levels of SCC, CEA, and CA125 in the OG group were significantly lower than those in the CG group; The CD4+ levels in the OG group were significantly higher and the CD8+ levels significantly lower than those in the CG group. A 24-month follow-up showed that the survival rate of the OG group was 47.50% (19/40), which was significantly higher than that of the CG group at 27.50% (11/40).
conclusionCT-guided radiofrequency ablation and targeted therapy have been proven effective in treating lung cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.