SynthesisInfectious disorders drug targets2025
Herbal Medicine for the Management of Wounds: A Systematic Review of Clinical Studies.
Synthesis in Infectious disorders drug targets, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Clinical Effectiveness of Traditional Polyherbal Formulations for Wound Healing: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.TheScientificWorldJournal · 2026Pooled it
- Effect of Topically Administered Natural Compounds on Cesarean Section Healing-A Retrospective Observational Study.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Hypochlorous Acid: Clinical Insights and Experience in Dermatology, Surgery, Dentistry, Ophthalmology, Rhinology, and Other Specialties.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- An Update of Phytotherapeutic Advances of Marigold (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCuts and wounds are unfortunate yet inevitable events. Traditional remedies have historically harnessed various plants for wound healing, undergoing clinical and pre-clinical scrutiny. Hence, this systematic review focuses on clinically researched herbal formulations for wound healing. METHODOLOGY: Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta- Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, databases like Google Scholar, Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, J-gate, and Ayush Research Portal were meticulously searched for clinical trials involving wound-targeting herbal formulations, alongside a comprehensive hunt for preclinical plant data.
resultsAmong 623 screened documents, 26 published clinical trials spotlighting herbal wound healing formulations were identified. All studies showcased significant wound healing progress, with some surpassing standard betadine treatment. Only one study reported an adverse effect. Within the 26 formulations, 45 distinct plant species were employed, with 35 exhibiting wound healing attributes like antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant activities scientifically. Enhanced collagen content, stabilized fibers, activated fibroblast cells, increased total protein, elevated growth factors, hydroxyproline, hexosamine, and tissue protein demonstrate the efficacy of plants, such as
conclusionThe findings of the current study indicated that medicinal plants are effective and safe agents for the treatment of wounds, though larger, well-designed trials are needed for definitive role confirmation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39757623What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.