ArticleAging cell2025
DeepQA: A Unified Transcriptome-Based Aging Clock Using Deep Neural Networks.
Article in Aging cell, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Pasta, a Versatile Transcriptomic Clock, Maps the Chemical and Genetic Determinants of Aging and Rejuvenation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Discovering Candidate Anti-Aging Perturbations Using a Foundation Model for Gene Expression.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- A Machine-Learning Approach Identifies Rejuvenating Interventions in the Human Brain.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Estimation of biological aging based on T-cell differentiation trajectories: emerging and future avenues.Frontiers in aging · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding the complex biological process of aging is of great value, especially as it can help develop therapeutics to prolong healthy life. Predicting biological age from gene expression data has shown to be an effective means to quantify aging of a subject, and to identify molecular and cellular biomarkers of aging. A typical approach for estimating biological age, adopted by almost all existing aging clocks, is to train machine learning models only on healthy subjects, but to infer on both healthy and unhealthy subjects. However, the inherent bias in this approach results in inaccurate biological age as shown in this study. Moreover, almost all existing transcriptome-based aging clocks were built around an inefficient procedure of gene selection followed by conventional machine learning models such as elastic nets, linear discriminant analysis etc. To address these limitations, we proposed DeepQA, a unified aging clock based on mixture of experts. Unlike existing methods, DeepQA is equipped with a specially designed Hinge-Mean-Absolute-Error (Hinge-MAE) loss so that it can train on both healthy and unhealthy subjects of multiple cohorts to reduce the bias of inferring biological age of unhealthy subjects. Our experiments showed that DeepQA significantly outperformed existing methods for biological age estimation on both healthy and unhealthy subjects. In addition, our method avoids the inefficient exhaustive search of genes, and provides a novel means to identify genes activated in aging prediction, alternative to such as differential gene expression analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.