ArticleJournal of public health management and practice : JPHMP
Genomic Surveillance of Foodborne Pathogens: Advances and Obstacles.
Article in Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Algorithm and Software to Type Stx Operons Accurately from Assembled Genomic Sequence.Microorganisms · 2026Article
- Clonally relatedASM case reports · 2026Article
- Meat-Borne Bacterial Pathogen Detection: Conventional, Molecular and Emerging AI-Based Strategies.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Describing the outcomes and factors of using pathogen genomic results in public health.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Community-associated Carbapenem-Resistant Organism Case Investigations in New York City.Open forum infectious diseases · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
contextThe genomic surveillance of foodborne pathogens in the United States has grown exponentially in the past decade, grounded in a powerful combination of novel sequencing technologies, bioinformatic approaches, data-sharing networks, and metadata harmonization efforts. This practice report examines recent advances in genomic epidemiology as applied to food safety programs and delineates State, Tribal, Local, and Territorial infrastructure necessary for continued life-saving improvements in public health. PROGRAM: National databases of foodborne pathogen genomes, along with data sharing and evaluation networks such as GenomeTrakr and PulseNet, have transformed how connections are made among isolates and how root causes of outbreaks are determined, allowing much more timely interventions to protect public health. Freely available bioinformatics tools such as GalaxyTrakr and the National Center for Biotechnology Information Pathogen Detection database have allowed laboratories with limited local computing resources to participate in surveillance efforts and contribute to traceback investigations. IMPLEMENTATION: In this report, we describe advances in genomic epidemiology that have occurred over the past decade and examine obstacles to fully implementing this technology within State, Tribal, Local, and Territorial public health systems. EVALUATION: Despite a clear return on investment from governmental expenditures on genomic surveillance of foodborne pathogens, we identify significant obstacles to further sustained progress. These obstacles include workforce gaps, ineffective data sharing, and lack of constitutive and sustained funding. DISCUSSION: Many public health laboratories face major obstacles to widespread and routine adoption of genomic surveillance technologies. While whole genome sequencing has become an integral part of routine public health microbiology, the seamless integration of these protocols into the existing practices, laboratory workflows, and information systems remains challenging. Centralized efforts to address these issues include (1) support through the Food and Drug Administration Laboratory Flexible Funding Model, (2) training and proficiency assessments, (3) open-source, standardized protocols for collecting high-quality genomic data, and (4) open access informatics software.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.