ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2025
Predicting treatment response and survival in rectal cancer: insights from 18 FDG-PET/MRI post-neoadjuvant therapy.
Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical utility and future directions of FDG-PET in rectal cancer management.Annals of nuclear medicine · 2026Review
- An exploratory integrative analysis of plasma transcriptomic and proteomic predictors of response to total neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Theranostics in the management of colorectal cancer.Discover nano · 2025Review
- The Application of Combined PET/MRI in Staging and Response Assessment of Rectal Cancer.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Early response prediction during radiotherapy in rectal cancer using sequential diffusion-weighted imaging at a magnetic resonance image-guided linear accelerator.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAccurate identification of patients with pathologic complete response (pCR) following neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (RCT) for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is essential. 18-FDG PET/MRI provides metabolic information that complements the morphological assessment of standard MRI, potentially enhancing the differentiation between fibrotic and tumorous tissues post-treatment. This study aims to evaluate the performance of 18-FDG PET/MRI in assessing treatment response compared to standard MRI. MATERIALS AND
methodsA prospective study was conducted at HM Sanchinarro University Hospital, Madrid, from 2018 to 2021. Patients with LARC undergoing RCT were included and staged at diagnosis and restaged 8-12 weeks post-neoadjuvant treatment using 18-FDG PET/MRI. The primary outcome was to compare the performance of PET/MRI and standard MRI in detecting pCR and tumor regression grade (TRG) confirmed via histopathological examination. Quantitative analysis assessed the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and standardized uptake value (SUV). A secondary outcome included survival analysis using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analysis for radiological and pathological prognostic markers.
resultsAmong 33 patients, pCR was observed in 45% (14/33). PET/MRI demonstrated sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy values of 0.88, 0.80, and 0.84, respectively, for detecting pCR, compared to 0.82, 0.50, and 0.67 for standard MRI (p < 0.001). PET/MRI accurately identified TRG stages in 72% of cases, compared to 50% for standard MRI. Post-SUV, post-ADC, and delta-ADC were the most precise PET/MRI predictors for pCR, with AUC values of 0.81, 0.75, and 0.55, respectively. Patients with mrEMVI and mrTRG showed worse disease-free survival (DFS).
conclusion18-FDG PET/MRI emerges as a promising imaging tool for predicting response to neoadjuvant treatment in rectal cancer, with superior diagnostic accuracy compared to standard MRI. Radiological findings, such as EMVI, can identify high-risk patients, offering valuable prognostic insights.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.