Observational studyJournal of anesthesia2025
The ability of diaphragmatic excursion after extubation to predict the need for resumption of ventilatory support in critically ill surgical patients.
Observational study in Journal of anesthesia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Diaphragmatic excursion after extubation and resumption of ventilatory support in critically ill surgical patients: remains to be verified.Journal of anesthesia · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study evaluated the ability of diaphragmatic excursion (DE), measured 2 h after extubation, to predict the need for resumption of ventilatory support within 48 h in surgical critically ill patients.
methodsThis prospective observational study included adult surgical critically ill patients intubated for > 24 h and extubated after a successful spontaneous breathing trial. Sonographic measurement of the DE was performed 2 h after extubation. Patients were followed up for 48 h after extubation and were divided into reintubation group and successful weaning group. The primary outcome was DE's ability to predict the need for resumption of ventilatory support using the area under receiver characteristic curve (AUC) analysis.
resultsData from 70 patients were analyzed and 25/70 (36%) patients needed reintubation. DE was lower in the reintubation group than the successful weaning group. The AUC (95% confidence interval) for the ability of DE to predict the need for resumption of ventilatory support was 0.98(0.92-1.00) and 0.97(0.89-1.00) for the right and left side, respectively. At cutoff values of 20.8 and 19.8 mm, the right and left DE had positive predictive values of 92% and 88% and negative predictive values of 96% and 93%, respectively.
conclusionAmong surgical critically ill patients undergoing weaning from invasive mechanical ventilation, DE obtained 2h after extubation is an accurate predictor for the need for resumption of ventilatory support. Diaphragmatic excursion < 20-21 mm could predict the need for resumption of ventilatory support with a positive predictive value of 88-92% and negative predictive value of 93-96%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.