ArticleGeroScience2025
Disentangling the effect of sex from brain size on brain organization and cognitive functioning.
Article in GeroScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sex differences in vulnerability to tau pathology: Impact on cognitive decline.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Article
- Distinct Longitudinal Clinical-Neuroanatomical Trajectories in Parkinson's Disease Clinical Subtypes: Insight toward Precision Medicine.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2025Article
- Apathy progression is associated with brain atrophy and white matter damage in Parkinson's disease.Brain communications · 2025Article
- Intracranial volume: To adjust or not to adjust? It is not a matter of if, but how.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neuroanatomical sex differences estimated in neuroimaging studies are confounded by total intracranial volume (TIV) as a major biological factor. Employing a matching approach widely used for causal modeling, we disentangled the effect of TIV from sex to study sex-differentiated brain aging trajectories, their relation to functional networks and cytoarchitectonic classes, brain allometry, and cognition. Using data from the UK Biobank, we created subsamples that removed, maintained, or exaggerated the TIV differences in the original sample. We compared regional and vertex-level sex estimates across subsamples. The overall sex-related differences diminished in head size-matched subsamples, suggesting that most of the observed variability results from TIV differences. Furthermore, bidirectional sex differences in brain neuroanatomy emerged that were previously masked by the effect of TIV. Allometry remained fairly consistent across lifespan and was not sex-differentiated. Finally, the matching process changed the direction of the estimated sex differences in "verbal and numerical reasoning" and "working memory", suggesting that behavioral sex difference investigations can benefit from additional biological analysis to uncover the underlying factors contributing to cognition. Taken together, we provide new evidence disentangling sex differences from TIV as a relevant biological confound.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.