ReviewJournal of neuro-oncology2025
Advances in molecular prognostication and treatments in ependymoma.
Review in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spinal ependymoma: a comprehensive review of molecular classification, management guidelines, and clinical outcomes with a focus on the pediatric population (Part III of ependymomas across compartments).Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Review
- CAR T cells targeting the glycoprotein GD2 show potent antitumor efficacy in high-risk ependymoma models.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2026Article
- Optimizing outcomes in intracranial ependymoma: a contemporary review.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ependymoma is the third most common brain tumour of childhood and historically has posed a major challenge to both pediatric and adult neuro-oncologists. Ependymoma can occur anywhere in the central nervous system throughout the entire age spectrum. Treatment options have been limited to surgery and radiation, and outcomes have been widely disparate across studies. Indeed, these disparate outcomes have rendered it extraordinarily difficult to compare studies and to truly understand which patients are low and high-risk. Over the past two decades there have been tremendous advances in our understanding of the biology of ependymoma, which have changed risk stratification dramatically. Indeed, it is now well accepted that ependymoma comprises multiple distinct entities, whereby each compartment (supratentorial, posterior fossa, spinal) are distinct, and within each compartment there exist unique groups. The driver events, demographics and response to treatment vary widely across these groups and allow for a better classification of thee disease. Herein, we review the advances in the molecular stratification of ependymoma including how an improved classification and risk stratification allows for more precise therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39757304What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.