ArticleNPJ digital medicine2025
Efficiency and safety of automated label cleaning on multimodal retinal images.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning-guided bioelectrical impedance mapping for rapid adjunctive margin assessment in Mohs surgery.npj biomedical innovations · 2026Article
- Advances in Optical Tissue Clearing for Three-Dimensional Ocular Imaging and Analysis.Journal of ophthalmology · 2026Review
- Robust colonoscopy polyp segmentation using dynamic-Nu T-Loss with multi-scale and uncertainty-aware adaptation.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Label noise is a common and important issue that would affect the model's performance in artificial intelligence. This study assessed the effectiveness and potential risks of automated label cleaning using an open-source framework, Cleanlab, in multi-category datasets of fundus photography and optical coherence tomography, with intentionally introduced label noise ranging from 0 to 70%. After six cycles of automatic cleaning, significant improvements are achieved in label accuracies (3.4-62.9%) and dataset quality scores (DQS, 5.1-74.4%). The majority (86.6 to 97.5%) of label errors were accurately modified, with minimal missed (0.5-2.8%) or misclassified (0.4-10.6%). The classification accuracy of RETFound significantly improved by 0.3-52.9% when trained with the datasets after cleaning. We also developed a DQS-guided cleaning strategy to mitigate over-cleaning. Furthermore, external validation on EyePACS and APTOS-2019 datasets boosted label accuracy by 1.3 and 1.8%, respectively. This approach automates label correction, enhances dataset reliability, and strengthens model performance efficiently and safely.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.