ArticleRheumatology and therapy2025
Real-World Persistence and Effectiveness of Upadacitinib versus Other Janus Kinase Inhibitors and Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors in Australian Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis.
Article in Rheumatology and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The role of sequential biologic therapy in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy, safety, and predictive factors.Clinical rheumatology · 2025Pooled it
- Long-term Comparative Adherence and Switch Rates in Patients Receiving Advanced Therapies for Rheumatoid Arthritis After Use of One TNF Inhibitor.Rheumatology and therapy · 2026Article
- Real-World Upadacitinib Persistence and Clinical Outcomes Among Canadian Patients with Inflammatory Arthritis from a Patient Support Program: The UPRAISE Study.Rheumatology and therapy · 2026Article
- Choosing the next option: a scenario-based roadmap for b/tsDMARD sequencing in rheumatoid arthritis.Clinical rheumatology · 2026Review
- Persistence and effectiveness of upadacitinib and TNFi for rheumatoid arthritis using pooled data from Canadian and Swiss registries.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2026Observational
- Comparative Effectiveness of Upadacitinib vs. Other JAK Inhibitors in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis in a Global Real-World Setting.Rheumatology and therapy · 2026Article
- Achievement and Maintenance of Remission with Upadacitinib in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis in Italy: 1-Year Data from UPHOLD, a Prospective Real-World Observational Study.Rheumatology and therapy · 2026Article
- Upadacitinib in rheumatoid arthritis: progress and challenges.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Clinical and ultrasound remission at 48 weeks of upadacitinib in rheumatoid arthritis: real-world results from the Italian multicenter UPARAREMUS study.Arthritis research & therapy · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThis study sought to describe treatment patterns, persistence, and effectiveness of upadacitinib (UPA) alone and compared to other Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis) or tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
methodsThis retrospective, non-interventional study used the OPAL dataset, derived from electronic medical records. Patients initiated UPA (N = 2624), other JAKis (baricitinib and tofacitinib [N = 925]), or TNFis (adalimumab, etanercept, certolizumab, golimumab, infliximab [N = 3540]) between May 2020 and March 2023. Median persistence (Kaplan-Meier) and effectiveness (Disease Activity Score 28-joint C-reactive protein, three variables [DAS28CRP{3}]) were evaluated for UPA-treated patients and in three propensity score-matched cohorts: UPA monotherapy versus combination therapy, UPA versus other JAKis, and UPA versus TNFis.
resultsIn patients prescribed UPA, 41.3% were ≥ 65 years old, 33.8% were prescribed as first-line advanced therapy, and 27.2% were prescribed monotherapy. Persistence on UPA was 26.6 months (95% confidence intervals: 24.4, 29.9) and longest in earlier lines of therapy. The DAS28CRP(3) remission rate was 73% at 3 months, with improvements observed across lines of therapy. UPA monotherapy and combination therapy had similar persistence (27.8 [23.5, 33.4] versus 30.4 months [22.1, 35.3], p = 0.84) and effectiveness. UPA showed longer persistence than other JAKis (28.8 [25.6, 32.4] versus 17.2 months [14.9, 19.8], p < 0.001) and TNFis (26.6 [24.9, 30.8] versus 13.3 months [11.5, 14.5], p < 0.001). DAS28CRP(3) remission rates were greater at 3 months for UPA than other JAKis (75.0% versus 61.5%) and TNFis (72.7% versus 59.5%). In unmatched subgroups, compared to cycling between TNFis, switching to UPA from other JAKis or TNFis resulted in longer persistence (JAKi-to-UPA: 25.3 [16.1, not reached]; TNFi-to-UPA: 27.8 [23.2, 35.4]; TNFi-to-TNFi: 9.6 [8.4, 10.7]) and greater DAS28CRP(3) remission rates over 9 months.
conclusionsOverall, the breadth and depth of data from this large real-world dataset continue to support a favorable clinical profile of UPA for the treatment of RA and may inform treatment choices in everyday clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.