ArticleScientific reports2025
A hybrid framework for colorectal cancer detection and U-Net segmentation using polynetDWTCADx.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Dataset of Abdominal CT with Artery and Vein Segmentations for Colorectal Cancer Surgical Planning.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Deep multimodal state-space fusion of endoscopic-radiomic and clinical data for survival prediction in colorectal cancer.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- SpinachXAI-Rec: a multi-stage explainable AI framework for spinach freshness classification and consumer recommendation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A hybrid framework for enhanced segmentation and classification of colorectal cancer histopathology.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
"PolynetDWTCADx" is a sophisticated hybrid model that was developed to identify and distinguish colorectal cancer. In this study, the CKHK-22 dataset, comprising 24 classes, served as the introduction. The proposed method, which combines CNNs, DWTs, and SVMs, enhances the accuracy of feature extraction and classification. The study employs DWT to optimize and enhance two integrated CNN models before classifying them with SVM following a systematic procedure. PolynetDWTCADx was the most effective model that we evaluated. It was capable of attaining a moderate level of recall, as well as an area under the curve (AUC) and accuracy during testing. The testing accuracy was 92.3%, and the training accuracy was 95.0%. This demonstrates that the model is capable of distinguishing between noncancerous and cancerous lesions in the colon. We can also employ the semantic segmentation algorithms of the U-Net architecture to accurately identify and segment cancerous colorectal regions. We assessed the model's exceptional success in segmenting and providing precise delineation of malignant tissues using its maximal IoU value of 0.93, based on intersection over union (IoU) scores. When these techniques are added to PolynetDWTCADx, they give doctors detailed visual information that is needed for diagnosis and planning treatment. These techniques are also very good at finding and separating colorectal cancer. PolynetDWTCADx has the potential to enhance the recognition and management of colorectal cancer, as this study underscores.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.