ArticleScientific reports2025
Phylogenetic analysis and detection of positive selection in the SIRT gene family across vertebrates.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
SIRT6, a member of the sirtuin protein family, is recognized as a tumor suppressor. This study investigates the evolutionary history of the SIRT gene family and examines the selective pressures shaping their functional divergence. Insights into the evolution of these genes may enhance our understanding of their roles in disease pathology. Seventy-three amino acid sequences and full-length mRNA sequences from 22 vertebrate species and one invertebrate were retrieved from public databases. Phylogenetic relationships among the seven SIRT gene family members were reconstructed using Bayesian inference. Codon-based models were applied to detect site-specific positive selection, and likelihood ratio tests (LRTs) were used to compare model fits. Positively selected sites were identified using Bayesian empirical Bayes (BEB) methods. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that the seven SIRT gene family members in vertebrates originated from gene duplication events. Asymmetric evolutionary rates and natural selection were identified as the primary drivers of SIRT gene divergence. Eleven positively selected sites (23I, 310 S, 311I, 313 A, 316 K, 320 C, 321 A, 322Q, 323 H, 327E, 328P) were identified with high confidence (posterior probability ≥ 99%), suggesting critical roles in functional divergence. The evolution of the SIRT gene family is characterized by gene duplication and natural selection. The reconstructed phylogenetic tree elucidates the relationships among the seven members, with SIRT6 emerging as a key evolutionary node. Positively selected sites identified in this study may represent mutation hotspots, providing potential targets for future cancer therapy research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.