ArticleNature communications2025
Depth-corrected multi-factor dissection of chromatin accessibility for scATAC-seq data with PACS.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- scATAnno: Automated Cell Type Annotation for Single-cell ATAC-seq Data.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2026Article
- A hierarchical, count-based model highlights challenges in scATAC-seq data analysis and points to opportunities to extract finer-resolution information.Genome biology · 2025Article
- Depth-corrected multi-factor dissection of chromatin accessibility for scATAC-seq data with PACS.Nature communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Single cell ATAC-seq (scATAC-seq) experimental designs have become increasingly complex, with multiple factors that might affect chromatin accessibility, including genotype, cell type, tissue of origin, sample location, batch, etc., whose compound effects are difficult to test by existing methods. In addition, current scATAC-seq data present statistical difficulties due to their sparsity and variations in individual sequence capture. To address these problems, we present a zero-adjusted statistical model, Probability model of Accessible Chromatin of Single cells (PACS), that allows complex hypothesis testing of accessibility-modulating factors while accounting for sparse and incomplete data. For differential accessibility analysis, PACS controls the false positive rate and achieves a 17% to 122% higher power on average than existing tools. We demonstrate the effectiveness of PACS through several analysis tasks, including supervised cell type annotation, compound hypothesis testing, batch effect correction, and spatiotemporal modeling. We apply PACS to datasets from various tissues and show its ability to reveal previously undiscovered insights in scATAC-seq data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.