ArticleJournal of hematology & oncology2025
Impact of circulating lymphoma cells at diagnosis on outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed de novo diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Article in Journal of hematology & oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Case Report: longitudinal immunoglobulin abnormalities preceding IgA-λ MGUS and colonic DLBCL: a case suggesting immune-driven B-cell dysregulation.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Optimization of CAR-T therapy based on metabolic remodeling of the tumor immune microenvironment in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.American journal of cancer research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), the most common B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma rarely presents with circulating lymphoma cells (CL) at diagnosis. Previous studies were limited by small sample size precluding robust analysis. Hence, we evaluated the prognostic relevance of CL cells in newly diagnosed DLBCL patients. Based on peripheral blood (PB) immunophenotyping, patients were grouped into CL + and CL-. CL was defined as detectable clonally restricted B-cells that matched the actual or expected B-cell immunophenotype of DLBCL. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and diagnosis-to-treatment interval (DTI). Among the 1266 patients with DLBCL, 621 had PB flow at diagnosis, and after excluding patients not meeting eligibility criteria, 588 cases remained. Among these, 85 (15%) were CL + and 503 were CL- (85%). Patients in CL + group were younger (67 vs. 70 years, p = 0.03) with a higher proportion of non-bulky disease (85% vs. 56%, p < 0.0001), normal albumin (79% vs. 54%, p < 0.0001), and MYC/BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements (18% vs. 7%, p = 0.003) compared to the CL - group. Patients with CL at diagnosis had significantly inferior PFS and OS compared with those without CL. After adjusting for factors associated with inferior PFS and OS in univariable analysis, presence of CL remained significantly associated with inferior PFS (HR = 2.04, 95%CI = 1.47-2.84, p < 0.0001) and OS (HR = 1.61, 95%CI = 1.1-2.36, p = 0.01), respectively. There was no significant difference in DTI between the two groups. Given the prognostic relevance associated with presence of CL, clinicians should consider checking PB flow at diagnosis in all newly diagnosed DLBCL patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.