Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39757114›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2024

ProtGraph: a tool for the quick and comprehensive exploration and exploitation of the peptide search space derived from protein sequence databases using graphs.

Dominik Lux, Katrin Marcus-Alic, Martin Eisenacher, Julian Uszkoreit

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dominik LuxRuhr University Bochum, Medical Faculty, Medizinisches Proteom-Center, Gesundheitscampus 4, 44801 Bochum, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7490-8260
Katrin Marcus-AlicRuhr University Bochum, Medical Faculty, Medizinisches Proteom-Center, Gesundheitscampus 4, 44801 Bochum, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3313-8845
Martin EisenacherRuhr University Bochum, Medical Faculty, Medizinisches Proteom-Center, Gesundheitscampus 4, 44801 Bochum, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2687-7444
Julian UszkoreitRuhr University Bochum, Medical Faculty, Core Unit Bioinformatics - CUBiMed.RUB, Universitätsstr. 105, 44789 Bochum, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7522-4007

Funding

Deutsche Gesetzliche Unfallversicherung FR273German Federal Ministry of Education and Research FKZ 031 A 534AGerman Network for Bioinformatics InfrastructureMedical Faculty, Ruhr University Bochum F953N-2019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to computational resource limitations, in mass spectrometry based proteomics only a limited set of peptide sequences is used for the matching against measured spectra. We present an approach to represent proteins by graphs and allow not only the canonical sequences but also known isoforms and annotated amino acid variations, e.g. originating from genomic mutations, and further common protein sequence features contained in Uniprot KB or other protein databases. Our C++ and Python implementation enables a groundbreaking comprehensive characterization of the peptide search space, encompassing for the first time all available annotations in a protein database (in combination more than $10^{200}$ possibilities). Additionally, it can be used to quickly extract the relevant subset of the search space for peptide to spectrum matching, e.g. filtering by the peptide mass. We demonstrate the advantages and innovative findings of our implementation compared to previous workflows by re-analysing publicly available datasets.

Indexed as

Databases, ProteinPeptidesProteomicsSoftwareAlgorithmsAmino Acid SequenceComputational BiologyHumansMass SpectrometryProteinsSequence Analysis, ProteinPeptidesProteinsbioinformaticsgraphsproteomicsvariants

Identifiers

PMID39757114
PMCPMC11700661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.