ArticleInternational dental journal2025
Long-Term Predictive Modelling of the Craniofacial Complex Using Machine Learning on 2D Cephalometric Radiographs.
Article in International dental journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence for craniofacial and mandibular growth prediction: A systematic review.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Pooled it
- Comparison of multivariate linear regression and random forest model in developing mandibular chin prediction reconstruction equation.Oral and maxillofacial surgery · 2026Article
- Progress of Multimodal Imaging: Bridging Orthodontics to Comprehensive Oral Multidisciplinary Care.International dental journal · 2026Review
- Cranial Base Morphology and Mandibular Growth in Skeletal Deep Bite: A Longitudinal Study in Prepubertal Children.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Feasibility of Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis Using Mixed Reality-based Dynamic Navigation: A Preclinical Study.International dental journal · 2026Article
- Present and Future of the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Orthodontics.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Advancements in Dental Science through Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning: A Comprehensive Review.International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry · 2026Review
- Growth Prediction in Orthodontics: ASystematic Review of Past Methods up to Artificial Intelligence.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to predict long-term growth-related changes in skeletal and dental relationships within the craniofacial complex using machine learning (ML) models. MATERIALS AND
methodsCephalometric radiographs from 301 subjects, taken at pre-pubertal (T1, age 11) and post-pubertal stages (T2, age 18), were analysed. Three ML models-Lasso regression, Random Forest, and Support Vector Regression (SVR)-were trained on a subset of 240 subjects, while 61 subjects were used for testing. Model performance was evaluated using mean absolute error (MAE), intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), and clinical thresholds (2 mm or 2°).
resultsMAEs for skeletal measurements ranged from 1.36° (maxilla to cranial base angle) to 4.12 mm (mandibular length), and for dental measurements from 1.26 mm (lower incisor position) to 5.40° (upper incisor inclination). ICCs indicated moderate to excellent agreement between actual and predicted values. The highest prediction accuracy within the 2 mm or 2° clinical thresholds was achieved for maxilla to cranial base angle (80%), lower incisor position (75%), and maxilla to mandible angle (70%). Pre-pubertal measurements and sex consistently emerged as the most important predictive factors.
conclusionsML models demonstrated the ability to predict post-pubertal values for maxilla to cranial base, mandible to cranial base, maxilla to mandible angles, upper and lower incisor positions, and upper face height with a clinically acceptable margin of 2 mm or 2°. Prediction accuracy was higher for skeletal relationships compared to dental relationships over the 8-year growth period. Pre-pubertal values of the measurements and sex emerged consistently as the most important predictors of the post-pubertal values.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.