Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39757033›Full record

ArticleInternational dental journal2025

Long-Term Predictive Modelling of the Craniofacial Complex Using Machine Learning on 2D Cephalometric Radiographs.

Michael Myers, Michael D Brown, Sarkhan Badirli, George J Eckert, Diane Helen-Marie Johnson, Hakan Turkkahraman

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in International dental journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Michael MyersDepartment of Orthodontics and Oral Facial Genetics, Indiana University School of Dentistry, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Michael D BrownIndiana University School of Dentistry, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Sarkhan BadirliEli Lilly & Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
George J EckertDepartment of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Diane Helen-Marie JohnsonDepartment of Orthodontics and Oral Facial Genetics, Indiana University School of Dentistry, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Hakan TurkkahramanDepartment of Orthodontics and Oral Facial Genetics, Indiana University School of Dentistry, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA. Electronic address: haturk@iu.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to predict long-term growth-related changes in skeletal and dental relationships within the craniofacial complex using machine learning (ML) models. MATERIALS AND

methodsCephalometric radiographs from 301 subjects, taken at pre-pubertal (T1, age 11) and post-pubertal stages (T2, age 18), were analysed. Three ML models-Lasso regression, Random Forest, and Support Vector Regression (SVR)-were trained on a subset of 240 subjects, while 61 subjects were used for testing. Model performance was evaluated using mean absolute error (MAE), intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), and clinical thresholds (2 mm or 2°).

resultsMAEs for skeletal measurements ranged from 1.36° (maxilla to cranial base angle) to 4.12 mm (mandibular length), and for dental measurements from 1.26 mm (lower incisor position) to 5.40° (upper incisor inclination). ICCs indicated moderate to excellent agreement between actual and predicted values. The highest prediction accuracy within the 2 mm or 2° clinical thresholds was achieved for maxilla to cranial base angle (80%), lower incisor position (75%), and maxilla to mandible angle (70%). Pre-pubertal measurements and sex consistently emerged as the most important predictive factors.

conclusionsML models demonstrated the ability to predict post-pubertal values for maxilla to cranial base, mandible to cranial base, maxilla to mandible angles, upper and lower incisor positions, and upper face height with a clinically acceptable margin of 2 mm or 2°. Prediction accuracy was higher for skeletal relationships compared to dental relationships over the 8-year growth period. Pre-pubertal values of the measurements and sex emerged consistently as the most important predictors of the post-pubertal values.

Indexed as

Adolescent DevelopmentBody SizeCephalometryPredictive Learning ModelsRadiographySkull BaseAdolescentChildFaceHumansIncisorMaleMandibleMaxillaPredictive Value of TestsPubertyArtificial intelligenceCephalometric analysisCraniofacial complexGrowth and developmentMachine learningOrthodontics

Identifiers

PMID39757033
PMCPMC11806318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.