ArticleInternal medicine (Tokyo, Japan)2025
Comparison between the Outcomes of Pentamidine and Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole for Pneumocystis Pneumonia in Non-HIV Patients: A Nationwide Japanese Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective Data on the first-line treatment options for patients with Pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) without human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection are limited. Therefore, we evaluated the outcome of pentamidine compared to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) in non-HIV patients with PCP. Methods We used data from the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination Inpatient Database. We included non-HIV PCP patients who initially received TMP-SMX or pentamidine between July 2010 and March 2022. We categorized eligible patients into TMP-SMX and pentamidine groups and performed a propensity score overlap weighting analysis to compare in-hospital mortality between the groups. Results Among 5,870 eligible patients, 5,456 and 414 received TMP-SMX and pentamidine, respectively. Pentamidine treatment was associated with a higher in-hospital mortality than TMP-SMX treatment in the propensity score overlap weighting analysis (23.6% vs. 40.1%; risk difference, 16.5%; 95% confidence interval, 10.8-22.2%; p<0.001). Conclusions Based on these findings, pentamidine may not be as effective as TMP-SMX for treating PCP in non-HIV patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.