ReviewThe Journal of reproduction and development2025
Can Humanity Thrive Beyond the Galaxy?
Review in The Journal of reproduction and development, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Monosodium glutamate protects DNA of freeze-dried somatic cells and improves development of somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos.The Journal of reproduction and development · 2026Article
- Limitations of serial cloning in mammals.Nature communications · 2026Article
- The challenges and prospects of mammalian reproduction in extraterrestrial environments.The Journal of reproduction and development · 2026Review
- Freeze-Drying and Room Temperature Preservation of Mammalian Sperm.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Improved birth rates via rehydration of mouse freeze-dried spermatozoa using high-temperature ultrapure water.PloS one · 2026Article
- Monosodium glutamate enhances freeze-dried mouse sperm quality during room-temperature storage.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the future, human beings will surely expand into space. But given its unique risks, will humanity thrive in space environments? For example, when humans begin living and reproducing in space habitats or on other planets in the solar system, are there risks that future generations may suffer from adverse mutations induced by space radiation, or that embryos and fetuses will develop abnormally in gravitational environments that differ from that of Earth? Moreover, human expansion to other stellar systems requires that for each breed of animal, thousands of individuals must be transported to destination planets to prevent populations from experiencing inbreeding-related degeneration. In even more distant future, when humans have spread throughout the galaxy, all genetic resources on Earth, the planet where humans originated, must be permanently and safely stored- but is this even possible? Such issues with future space colonization may not be an urgent research priority, but research and technological development accompanying advancements in spaceflight will excite many people and contribute to technological improvements that can improve living standards in the present day (e.g., more effective treatments for infertility, etc.). This review will therefore focus primarily on issues related to mammalian reproduction in space environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.