ArticleWomen's health nursing (Seoul, Korea)2024
Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Maternal Health Literacy Inventory in Pregnancy scale: a methodological study.
Article in Women's health nursing (Seoul, Korea), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Maternal health literacy and its associated factors among pregnant women in Western Cape antenatal clinics.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2026Article
- The maternal health knowledge of pregnant women attending the antenatal clinics in the Western Cape: A cross-sectional study.Journal of public health in Africa · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to translate the Maternal Health Literacy Inventory in Pregnancy (MHELIP) scale into Turkish and evaluate its validity and reliability for use in the Turkish population.
methodsThe participants in this methodological study included 250 pregnant women who presented to the antenatal clinic of the Florence Nightingale Hospital in Istanbul, Turkiye. Content validity was assessed using expert approval. Confirmatory factor analysis, exploratory factor analysis, and structural equation modeling were used to assess the validity. Criterion validity was evaluated using the shortform health literacy survey tool, the Short-Form Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLS-SF12). To assess reliability, Cronbach's alpha, item analysis, and the test-retest method were used.
resultsThe mean age of the participants was 32.02±4.15 years. The content validity index of the scale was .99. The scale had a four-factor structure that fit well with 48 items. "Maternal health knowledge," "maternal health information search," "maternal health information assessment," and "maternal health decision making and behavior" subscales had Cronbach's alpha values of .91, .76, .85, and .90, respectively. The MHELIP and HLS-SF12 scores were significantly correlated (r=.422, p<.001).
conclusionThe MHELIP was found to be a valid and reliable measurement tool in pregnant Turkish women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.