ArticleClinical and experimental immunology2025
A multi-centre UK-based survey on angioedema secondary to acquired C1 inhibitor deficiency.
Article in Clinical and experimental immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Acquired angioedema due to C1 inhibitor deficiency: real-world clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Adaptation and Linguistic Validation of Angioedema PROMs in Latvian for Assessing Recurrent Angioedema.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
53 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAcquired angioedema due to C1-inhibitor deficiency (AAE-C1-INH) is very rare compared to its prototype, hereditary angioedema. An updated characterization of the AAE-C1-INH cohort in the UK is required to inform management.
objectivesTo describe the disease burden of AAE-C1-INH, long-term prophylaxis (LTP) and the clinical, immunochemical, and treatment profiles of AAE-associated diseases in the UK.
methodRetrospective data on 117 AAE-C1-INH patients were collected using a national survey proforma across 25/34 Adult Clinical Immunology and Allergy centres in the UK. Other European cohorts were compared.
resultsThe median age at AAE-C1-INH diagnosis was 65 years with 3.4% of patients diagnosed below 40 years. The median delay in diagnosis was 1 year. Antifibrinolytics and attenuated androgens showed comparable efficacy to LTP, at 88.9% and 89.5%, respectively. A haematological disorder was identified in 83.8% of AAE-C1-INH patients compared to 3.4% of autoimmune diseases. The predominant haematological disorders were splenic marginal zone lymphoma 34% followed by MGUS 16%. The severity of angioedema did not depend on the associated disease. Anti-C1INH-autoantibodies testing was limited to 23.1%. Rituximab monotherapy was effective in treating 9/9 splenic marginal zone lymphoma and 1/2 MGUS-associated AAE-C1-INH. Rituximab efficacy was independent of anti-C1INH-autoantibodies detection with response in 3/3 seronegative and 4/4 seropositive patients.
conclusionThe diagnosis of AAE-C1-INH should not be overlooked below the age of 40 years. The choice of oral LTP should be informed by the propensity to side effects. B cell depletion could be considered in treating monoclonal B cell disorder-associated-AAE-C1-INH in the absence of haematological indications. Further studies are required to address the clinical utility of anti-C1INH-autoantibodies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.