ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2025
Giant odontoma: A systematic scoping review and case report.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and importanceThe most common type of odontogenic tumor is odontoma. Cases with at least one dimension (sagittal, axial, or coronal) ≥30 mm were categorized as giant odontomas. This study aimed to provide a scoping review of giant odontoma and present a case report. CASE PRESENTATION: A 6 years-old boy attended for a routine dental examination without any symptoms. A slight swelling of the right buccal cortex of the posterior maxilla was detected. Radiography views revealed a mixed radiolucent-radiopaque lesion with multiple tooth-like structures. The lesion caused displacement teeth and elevated the floor of the maxillary sinus. The tumor was thoroughly enucleated and the dimensions of the tumor were measured as 32.4 mm × 22.2 mm × 15.3 mm. The specimen was histopathologically examined and was diagnosed as a giant compound odontoma. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: This scoping review indicated that the mean age of patients diagnosed with giant odontomas was 18.73 years, with no difference between the sexes. The posterior jaws were the most prevalent regions of incidence. The most common clinical manifestations are swelling, pain, and a sensation of hardness on palpation. Giant odontomas are usually diagnosed with panoramic radiography, cone-beam computed tomography, and histopathological examinations. Surgical enucleation is the treatment approach for this tumor.
conclusionThe distinction between giant odontoma and non-giant odontoma is solely based on tumor size. Although giant odontomas are benign, their large size necessitates specific precautions for diagnosis and management. Proper treatment involves critical decisions concerning surgical settings, bone grafting techniques, and jaw stabilization methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.