ReviewThe FEBS journal2025
Regulation of physiological and pathological condensates by molecular chaperones.
Review in The FEBS journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transcriptional responses to proteotoxic stressors are profoundly diverse and tissue-specific.Cell stress & chaperones · 2026Article
- A global thermodynamic-kinetic model capturing the hallmarks of liquid-liquid phase separation and amyloid aggregation.Cell reports. Physical science · 2026Article
- Stress-specific NONO interactomes reveal a key role of Hsp70 chaperone activity in regulation of paraspeckle formation.Journal of cell science · 2026Article
- In situ characterization of mitochondrial Hsp60-Hsp10 chaperone complex under folding stress.Science advances · 2025Article
- Biomolecular phase separation in tumorigenesis: from aberrant condensates to therapeutic vulnerabilities.Molecular cancer · 2025Review
- Engineering Bacillus subtilis for high-value bioproduction: recent advances and applications.Microbial cell factories · 2025Review
- Nonspecific interactions can lead to liquid-liquid phase separation in coiled-coil proteins models.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Protein aggregates and biomolecular condensates: implications for human health and disease.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Biomolecular condensates are dynamic membraneless compartments that regulate a myriad of cellular functions. A particular type of physiological condensate called stress granules (SGs) has gained increasing interest due to its role in the cellular stress response and various diseases. SGs, composed of several hundred RNA-binding proteins, form transiently in response to stress to protect mRNAs from translation and disassemble when the stress subsides. Interestingly, SGs contain several aggregation-prone proteins, such as TDP-43, FUS, hnRNPA1, and others, which are typically found in pathological inclusions seen in autopsy tissues from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD) patients. Moreover, mutations in these genes lead to the familial form of ALS and FTD. This has led researchers to propose that pathological aggregation is seeded by aberrant SGs: SGs that fail to properly disassemble, lose their dynamic properties, and become pathological condensates which finally 'mature' into aggregates. Here, we discuss the evidence supporting this model for various ALS/FTD-associated proteins. We further continue to focus on molecular chaperone-mediated regulation of ALS/FTD-associated physiological condensates on one hand, and pathological condensates on the other. In addition to SGs, we review ALS/FTD-relevant nuclear condensates, namely paraspeckles, anisosomes, and nucleolar amyloid bodies, and discuss their emerging regulation by chaperones. As the majority of chaperoning mechanisms regulate physiological condensate disassembly, we highlight parallel themes of physiological and pathological condensation regulation across different chaperone families, underscoring the potential for early disease intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.