ArticleScientific reports2025
Sentiment analysis of tweets employing convolutional neural network optimized by enhanced gorilla troops optimization algorithm.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prompt-based fine-tuning with multilingual transformers for language-independent sentiment analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- An intelligent ransomware based cyberthreat detection model using multi head attention-based recurrent neural networks with optimization algorithm in IoT environment.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sentiment analysis has become a difficult and important task in the current world. Because of several features of data, including abbreviations, length of tweet, and spelling error, there should be some other non-conventional methods to achieve the accurate results and overcome the current issue. In other words, because of those issues, conventional approaches cannot perform well and accomplish results with high efficiency. Emotional feelings, such as fear, anxiety, or traumas, often stem from many psychological issues experienced during childhood that can persist throughout life. In addition, people discuss and share their ideas on social media, often unconsciously representing their hidden emotions in the comments. This study is about sentiment analysis of tweets shared by several people. In fact, sentiment analysis can determine whether the shared comments and tweets are positive or negative. The paper introduces the use of a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), a kind of neural network, optimized by the Enhanced Gorilla Troops Optimization Algorithm (CNN-EGTO). Two datasets provided by the SemEval-2016 are used to evaluate the system, while the polarity of tweets were manually determined. It was determined by the findings of the present study that the suggested model could approximately achieve the values of 98%, 95%, 98%, and 96.47% for accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score, respectively, for positive polarity. In addition, the suggested model could gain the values of 97, 96, 98, and 97.49 for precision, recall, accuracy, and F1-score, respectively, for negative polarity. Consequently, it was found that the suggested model could outperform the other models by considering their performance and efficiency. These values of performance metrics represent that the suggested model could determine the polarity of sentence, positive or negative, with great efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.