Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39755908›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Cognitive load detection through EEG lead wise feature optimization and ensemble classification.

Jammisetty Yedukondalu, Kalyani Sunkara, Vankayalapati Radhika, Sivakrishna Kondaveeti, Murali Anumothu, Yadadavalli Murali Krishna

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jammisetty YedukondaluDepartment of ECE, QIS College of Engineering and Technology, Ongole, 523272, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Kalyani SunkaraSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, VIT-AP University, Amaravati, 522237, Andhra Pradesh, India. kalyani.s@vitap.ac.in.
Vankayalapati RadhikaDepartment of CSE-Data Science, VNR Vignana Jyothi Institute of Engineering and Technology, Hyderabad, India.
Sivakrishna KondaveetiCSE-AIML, MLR Institute of Technology, Dundigal, Hyderabad, 500043, India.
Murali AnumothuDepartment of ECE, QIS College of Engineering and Technology, Ongole, 523272, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Yadadavalli Murali KrishnaDepartment of ECE, Kallam Haranadhareddy Institute of Technology, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive load stimulates neural activity, essential for understanding the brain's response to stress-inducing stimuli or mental strain. This study examines the feasibility of evaluating cognitive load by extracting, selection, and classifying features from electroencephalogram (EEG) signals. We employed robust local mean decomposition (R-LMD) to decompose EEG data from each channel, recorded over a four-second period, into five modes. The binary arithmetic optimization (BAO) algorithm employed to reduce the feature space and extract multi-domain features from modes, thereby optimizing classification performance. Using six optimized machine learning (ML) classifiers, we conducted an exhaustive study that encompassed both lead-wise and overall feature classification. We improved our method by combining R-LMD-based multi-domain features with BAO and optimized ensemble learning (OEL) classifiers. It was 97.4% accuracy (AC) at finding cognitive load in the MAT (mental arithmetic task) dataset and 96.1% AC at finding it in the STEW (simultaneous workload) dataset. In the same vein, this work introduces lead-wise cognitive load detection, which offers both temporal and spatial information regarding brain activity during cognitive tasks. We analyzed the 19 and 14 leads for the MAT and STEW, respectively. The F3 lead was notably noteworthy in its ability to analyze a variety of cognitive tasks, obtaining the maximum classification AC of 94.5% and 94%, respectively. Our approach (R-LMD+BAO+OEL) outperformed existing state-of-the-art techniques in cognitive load detection.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsCognitionElectroencephalographyMachine LearningAdultBrainFemaleHumansMaleSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedYoung AdultBAOCognitive loadEEGLead-wiseOELR-LMD

Identifiers

PMID39755908
PMCPMC11700217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.