ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2025
Experiences of perinatal genetic screening for people from migrant and refugee backgrounds: a scoping review.
Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Preconception Care and Genetic Screening: A Global Review and Strategic Perspectives for Implementation in Bulgaria.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
People from refugee and migrant backgrounds often face poor experiences and outcomes in healthcare, and genetic healthcare is no exception. Understanding whether and how these health inequities manifest is an important step towards equitable perinatal genetic screening for genetic or chromosomal conditions (offered preconception, prenatally, or during the newborn period). A scoping review was conducted to review international evidence of perceptions and experiences of perinatal genetic screening for people from migrant and refugee backgrounds. Search strategies were applied to Medline, Embase, and CINAHL databases to identify articles meeting eligibility criteria. Evidence was synthesised using descriptive and content analysis, with theoretical frameworks of proportionate universality and relational autonomy used to interpret findings. Of 11,046 unique articles identified, twenty-six met inclusion criteria and underwent full-text review. Most studies were set in Western countries, and participants were primarily born in Asia, South America, or Africa. Studies indicated varying awareness, knowledge, attitudes, and uptake of screening. Several studies highlighted a lack of adequate in-language resources, the use of concepts that were unrecognised in particular communities, and poor interactions with healthcare providers. Strategies to address the above issues included person-centred counselling, increased consultation time, access to interpreters, and training for relevant providers. Other recommendations included addressing structural, financial, and geographical barriers to improve access to screening and associated care. Whilst additional research is required, we propose evidence and theory-informed strategies to improve perinatal genetic screening services for people from migrant and refugee backgrounds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.