ArticleInternal and emergency medicine2025
Evaluation of ST-segment and T-wave changes associated with NSTE-ACS in patients with RBBB: a nested case-control study design.
Article in Internal and emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients presenting with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in the emergency department (ED) require rapid and accurate electrocardiographic (ECG) evaluation. This study aims to assess conventional ECG markers for diagnosing non-ST-elevation ACS (NSTE-ACS) in patients with chest discomfort and right bundle branch block (RBBB). A nested case-control design was employed to compare patients with RBBB admitted to the ED for suspected cardiac ischemia, focusing on those who developed NSTE-ACS versus those who did not. The sample consisted of 352 patients with suspected ACS and RBBB identified on ECG. Among them, 88 were diagnosed with NSTE-ACS. In the presence of RBBB, ST-segment elevation on the isoelectric line and/or positive T-waves on the ECG were significantly associated with the diagnosis of NSTE-ACS (p < 0.05). In patients who developed NSTE-ACS, the likelihood of an isoelectric ST-segment was 3.48 (95% CI 2.07-5.82) times higher, the likelihood of positive T-waves was 4.16 (95% CI 2.51-6.91) times higher, and the combination of an isoelectric ST-segment with positive T-waves was 4.81 (95% CI 2.28-8.25) times higher (p < 0.05). In addition, ST-segment depression and non-negative T-waves were significantly more frequent in patients who developed NSTE-ACS, with odds ratios of 5.78 (95% CI 3-11.3), compared to those who did not (p < 0.05). The odds ratios for ST-segment and T-wave changes were 2.81 and 3.47, respectively, with an 80% correct classification rate for predicting NSTE-ACS. Clinicians should closely monitor the presence of an isoelectric ST-segment and positive T-waves in patients with RBBB to assess for potential cardiac ischemia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39755871What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.