ReviewMolecular and cellular biochemistry2025
Selenium: 48-year journey of global clinical trials.
Review in Molecular and cellular biochemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Selenium, an essential trace mineral for health, has seen a rise in clinical trials over the past nearly 5 decades. Our aim here is to provide a comprehensive and concise overview of selenium clinical trials from 1976 to 2023. Overall, the evolution of selenium clinical trials over 48 years has advanced through phases of emergence, prosperity, and either stability or transition. The USA plays pivotal roles in establishing large research clusters and fostering strong collaborative ties of selenium clinical trials. Low-selenium levels are noted in a higher proportion of selenium observational trials, while selenium intervention trials are delineated by nine key functional classifications. The emphasis in intervention trials is that selenium product development should be on conducting clinical trials in diseases with higher efficacy, such as those involving antioxidant and endocrine and metabolic disease. Moreover, inorganic forms such as sodium selenite and semi-organic forms like selenized yeast were recognized as primary sources of selenium, while nano-selenium has emerged as a new selenium source in clinical treatments. Selenium is mainly consumed through tablets and oral administration, with a recommended upper limit of 200 µg per day for managing most diseases. In addition, genes encoding selenoproteins or factors of relevance for selenium metabolism, inflammation, and immunity, which have a higher number of records in all trials, are poised to steer future investigations into functional mechanisms of selenium. We believe this review will offer fresh perspectives on selenium clinical trials and identify potential avenues for future selenium research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39755855What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.