ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2025
Toward structured abdominal examination training using augmented reality.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeStructured abdominal examination is an essential part of the medical curriculum and surgical training, requiring a blend of theory and practice from trainees. Current training methods, however, often do not provide adequate engagement, fail to address individual learning needs or do not cover rare diseases.
methodsIn this work, an application for structured Abdominal Examination Training using Augmented Reality (AETAR) is presented. Required theoretical knowledge is displayed step by step via virtual indicators directly on the associated body regions. Exercises facilitate building up the routine in performing the examination. AETAR was evaluated in an exploratory user study with medical students (n=12) and teaching surgeons (n=2).
resultsLearning with AETAR was described as fun and beneficial. Usability (SUS=73) and rated suitability for teaching were promising. All students improved in a knowledge test and felt more confident with the abdominal examination. Shortcomings were identified in the area of interaction, especially in teaching examination-specific movements.
conclusionAETAR represents a first approach to structured abdominal examination training using augmented reality. The application demonstrates the potential to improve educational outcomes for medical students and provides an important foundation for future research and development in digital medical education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.