ArticleScientific reports2025
Novel numerical and artificial neural computing with experimental validation towards unsteady micropolar nanofluid flow across a Riga plate.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Computational and machine learning analysis of bio-convective magnetized Ree-Eyring nanofluid flow on Riga plate with thermal radiation and activation energy.Discover nano · 2026Article
- Intelligent computing and sensitivity analysis of unsteady darcy-forchheimer nanofluid flow over an inclined permeable disk subject to thompson-troian slip conditions.Discover nano · 2026Article
- Machine learning based prediction of Williamson-Casson fluid flow with Cattaneo-Christov heat transfer over a curved stretching sheet.Discover nano · 2026Article
- Numerical investigation of thermal performance in unsteady Casson hybrid nanofluid flow across rotating disks under variable Darcy resistance and Joule heating.Discover nano · 2026Article
- Analysis of the EMHD nanofluid flow for geothermal pipelines using physics-driven deep learning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Thermophysical analysis of time-dependent magnetized Casson hybrid nanofluid flow (Cu + GO/Kerosene Oil) using Darcy-Forchheimer and thermal radiative models for industrial cooling applications.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fluid flow across a Riga Plate is a specialized phenomenon studied in boundary layer flow and magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) applications. The Riga Plate is a magnetized surface used to manipulate boundary layer characteristics and control fluid flow properties. Understanding the behavior of fluid flow over a Riga Plate is critical in many applications, including aerodynamics, industrial, and heat transfer operations. The unsteady Micropolar nanofluid (UMNF) flow across a vertically oriented, nonlinearly stretchable Riga sheet is examined in the present study. The effects of variable thermal conductivity, thermophoretic force, and Brownian diffusion on flow and heat transfer are analyzed. The fluid flow has been expressed in the form of a nonlinear system of PDEs (partial differential equations), which are reduced into the non-dimensional form of ordinary differential (ODEs) by employing the similarity transformation approach. The dataset for training the ANNs using the Levenberg-Marquardt backpropagation (LMBP) technique is generated using numerical simulation methods. The influence of physical constraints on the dimensionless temperature, concentration, microrotation, and velocity distributions are graphically displayed and discussed. Numerical results for skin friction, Sherwood, and Nusselt numbers are presented in tabular form. The numerical outcomes are compared to both published numerical and experimental results for validity purposes. It can be noticed that the flow rate is enhanced with the rising influence of the Hartmann number, buoyancy force, and velocity slip parameter. The UMNF flow model is validated, tested, and trained with an average numerical error of 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.