ArticleScientific reports2025
Electrical impedance-based tissue classification for bladder tumor differentiation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning-guided bioelectrical impedance mapping for rapid adjunctive margin assessment in Mohs surgery.npj biomedical innovations · 2026Article
- Classification of lung cancer tissue using bioimpedance spectroscopy and fractional-order circuit modeling.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2026Article
- The electrical tumor microenvironment: abnormalities and opportunities.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Including sensor information in medical interventions aims to support surgeons to decide on subsequent action steps by characterizing tissue intraoperatively. With bladder cancer, an important issue is tumor recurrence because of failure to remove the entire tumor. Impedance measurements can help to classify bladder tissue and give the surgeons an indication on how much tissue to remove. Over the years of research, it became obvious that electrical impedance spectroscopy is a very promising tool for tissue differentiation, but also a very sensitive one. While differentiation in preliminary studies shows great potential, challenges arise when transferring this concept to real, intraoperative conditions, mainly due to the influence of preoperative radiotherapy, possibly different tumor types, and mechanical tissue deformations due to peristalsis or unsteady contact force of the sensor. This work proposes a patient-based classification approach that evaluates the distance of an unknown measurement to a healthy reference of the same patient, essentially a relative classification of the difference in impedance that is robust against inter-individual differences and systematic errors. A diversified dataset covering multiple disturbance scenarios is recorded. Two alternatives to define features from the impedance data are investigated, namely using measurement points and model-based parameters. Based on the distance of the feature vector of a unknown measurement to a healthy reference, a Gaussian process classifier is trained. The approach achieves a high classification accuracy of up to 100% on noise-free impedance data recorded under controlled conditions. Even when the differentiation is more ambiguous due to external disturbances, the presented approach still achieves a classification accuracy of 80%. These results are a starting point to tackle intraoperative bladder tissue characterization and decrease the recurrence rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.