Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39755755›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Computational evaluation of micropores wetting effect on the removal process of CO

Abdulrahman Sumayli, Zakarya Ahmed, Vicky Jain, R Roopashree, Anjan Kumar, Aditya Kashyap, Mukesh Kumari, Sofia Gupta, G V Siva Prasad, Munthar Kadhim Abosaoda

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Abdulrahman SumayliDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, Najran University, Najran, Saudi Arabia. aisumayli@nu.edu.sa.
Zakarya AhmedCollege of Engineering, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University, IMSIU, 11432, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Vicky JainDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Marwadi University Research Center, Marwadi University, Rajkot, Gujarat, 360003, India.
R RoopashreeDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, School of Sciences, JAIN (Deemed to be University), Banglore, Karnataka, India.
Anjan KumarDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, GLA University, Mathura, 281406, India.
Aditya KashyapCenter for Research Impact and Outcome, Chitkara University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University, Rajpura, Punjab, 140401, India.
Mukesh KumariDepartment of Applied Science-Chemistry, NIMS Institute of Engineering & Technology, NIMS University, Rajasthan, Jaipur, India.
Sofia GuptaDepartment of Chemistry, Chandigarh Engineering College, Chandigarh Group of Colleges-Jhanjeri, Mohali, Punjab, 140307, India.
G V Siva PrasadDepartment of Chemistry, Raghu Engineering College, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, 531162, India.
Munthar Kadhim AbosaodaCollege of Pharmacy, The Islamic University, Najaf, Iraq.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the current years, gas-liquid membrane contactors (GLMCs) have been introduced as a promising, versatile and easy-to-operate technology for mitigating the emission of major greenhouse contaminants (i.e., CO

Indexed as

Amine solutionCFD simulationCO2 removalMembrane contactorMembrane wettability

Identifiers

PMID39755755
PMCPMC11700131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.