ArticleScientific reports2025
Pointer meters recognition method in the wild based on innovative deep learning techniques.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study presents a novel approach to identifying meters and their pointers in modern industrial scenarios using deep learning. We developed a neural network model that can detect gauges and one or more of their pointers on low-quality images. We use an encoder network, jump connections, and a modified Convolutional Block Attention Module (CBAM) to detect gauge panels and pointer keypoints in images. We also combine the output of the decoder network and the output of the improved CBAM as inputs to the Object Heatmap-Scalarmap Module to find pointer tip heat map peaks and predict pointer pointing. The method proposed in this paper is compared with several deep learning networks. The experimental results show that the model in this paper has the highest recognition correctness, with an average precision of 0.95 and 0.763 for Object Keypoint Similarity and Vector Direction Similarity, and an average recall of 0.951 and 0.856 in the test set, respectively, and achieves the best results in terms of efficiency and accuracy achieve the best trade-off, and performs well in recognizing multiple pointer targets. This demonstrates its robustness in real scenarios and provides a new idea for recognizing pointers in low-quality images more efficiently and accurately in complex industrial scenarios.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.