ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2025
Profiling of pathogenic variants in Japanese patients with sarcoglycanopathy.
Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Systematic reanalysis of next-generation sequencing data in 101 neuromuscular disorder families enhances diagnostic yield, reveals intronic variants, and identifies a novel disease gene.Journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Integrated Approach to Diagnosing Limb-Girdle Muscular Dystrophies in Resource-Limited Settings.Human mutation · 2026Article
- Genome-wide functional annotation and interpretation of splicing variants: toward RNA-targeted therapies.Journal of human genetics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSarcoglycanopathies (SGPs) are limb-girdle muscular dystrophies (LGMDs) that can be classified into four types, LGMDR3, LGMDR4, LGMDR5, and LGMDR6, caused by mutations in the genes, SGCA, SGCB, SGCG, and SGCD, respectively. SGPs are relatively rare in Japan. This study aims to profile the genetic variants that cause SGPs in Japanese patients.
methodsClinical course and pathological findings were retrospectively reviewed in Japanese patients with SGP. Genetic analyses were performed using a combination of targeted resequencing with a hereditary muscle disease panel, whole genome sequencing, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification, and long-read sequencing. The structures of transcripts with aberrant splicing were also determined by RT-PCR, RNA-seq, and in silico prediction.
resultsWe identified biallelic variants in SGC genes in 53 families, including three families with LGMDR6, which had not been identified in Japan so far. SGCA was the most common causative gene, accounting for 56% of cases, followed by SGCG, SGCB, and SGCD, at 17%, 21%, and 6%, respectively. Missense variants in SGCA were very frequent at 78.3%, while they were relatively rare in SGCB, SGCG, and SGCD at 11.1%, 18.2%, and 16.6%, respectively. We also analyzed the haplotypes of alleles carrying three variants found in multiple cases: c.229C > T in SGCA, c.325C > T in SGCB, and exon 6 deletion in SGCG; two distinct haplotypes were found for c.229C > T in SGCA, while each of the latter two variants was on single haplotypes.
conclusionsWe present genetic profiles of Japanese patients with SGPs. Haplotype analysis indicated common ancestors of frequent variants. Our findings will support genetic diagnosis and gene therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.