ArticleReproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E2025
Uterus didelphys: the first case report on molecular profiling of endometrial tissue from both uterine cavities.
Article in Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Impact of Congenital Anomalies of the Male and Female Reproductive Organs on Infertility and Recurrent Pregnancy Loss: A Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA didelphic uterus represents a unique and infrequent congenital condition in which a woman possesses two distinct uteri, each with its own cervix. This anomaly arises due to partial or incomplete merging of the Müllerian ducts during the developmental stages in the womb. Accounting for uterine malformations, a didelphic uterus is a relatively rare condition, affecting approximately 0.5-2% of the population and is considered one of the more uncommon types of uterine abnormalities.
methodsThis case report aims to study the physical separation in uterine didelphys and its impact on endometrial microbiome and inflammation, and the patterns of endometrial receptivity observed.
resultsEndometrial receptivity analyses revealed a similar receptive state in both uteri, both in the early receptive phase. Differential markers of chronic endometritis, including CD138, and MUM1-positive cells, were observed when comparing endometrial biopsies from both uteri. The right uterus exhibited a higher prevalence of these positive cells. Regarding the microbiome, significant differences were found between the uteri, notably in the right uterus, a clear non-dominance of lactobacilli and the presence of genera such as Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, and Acinetobacter. Additionally, the right uterus presented a less 'favourable' microenvironment, a characteristic that was also reflected in the right cervix; both sites presenting less lactobacilli than the left side samples. A distinct metabolomic signature associated with the physical separation of the uteri contributed to the differences in endometrial milieu.
conclusionsOur study revealed that physical separation, among other factors in uterus didelphys, affects the endometrial microbiome, metabolome, and inflammatory state, with significant microbiome variation observed between the uteri, although similar endometrial receptivity patterns were noted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.