ArticleBMC health services research2025
Health commodity management information system (Dagu-2 Software) implementation status in public health facilities of South-western Oromia, Ethiopia: a mixed method study.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo ensure the complete traceability of healthcare commodities, robust end-to-end data management protocols are needed for the supply chain. In Ethiopia, digital tools like Dagu-2 are used in the lower levels of the healthcare supply chain. However, there is a lack of information regarding the implementation status, factors, and challenges of Dagu-2, as it is a recent upgrade from the offline Dagu-1 application. Thus, this study aimed to assess the implementation status of Dagu-2 in public health facilities in Southwestern Oromia, Ethiopia.
methodsThe study employed a sequential explanatory mixed method design to investigate the implementation status of the Dagu2 program in 33 public health facilities in the Southwestern Oromia region of Ethiopia. Study participants were selected using a two-step approach. Firstly, public hospitals and health centers that had implemented Dagu-2 were identified. Secondly, 65 logistic practitioners, including store managers and pharmacy heads, who met the eligibility criteria were selected for the quantitative study. Quantitative data were collected using validated and reliable self-administered questionnaires and analysed using SPSS version 23. We run both descriptive and inferential statistical analyses. Fisher's exact test was used to discern the relationship between dependent and independent variables at p < 0.05. The qualitative data were gathered through in-depth interviews and underwent manual thematic analysis.
resultsOut of 65 questionnaires, 61 were completed (93.8% response rate). About 77.0% reported using Dagu-2 for operational and strategic decisions, and 80.3% used it for logistics performance monitoring. Roughly 78.7% of the participants indicated a positive implementation status for Dagu-2. Antivirus usage (p = 0.018) and administrative support (p = 0.002) significantly associated with the implementation. External support and user-friendliness facilitated the implementation, while infrastructure constraints, connectivity absence, weak management support, and project handover gaps were major obstacles.
conclusionOverall, the study revealed a promising implementation process and service quality improvements. However, challenges such as lack of management support, limited ICT infrastructure, absence of connectivity, weak management support, and project handover gaps became obstacles for successful implementation. To ensure an effective healthcare system, leveraging technology tools and securing stakeholder support through training are essential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.