ArticleLupus science & medicine2025
Racial differences in clinical trial perceptions among a large, predominantly Black cohort of people with systemic lupus erythematosus in the Southeastern USA.
Article in Lupus science & medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Group-Based Medical Mistrust and Logistical Factors Influencing Rheumatology Clinical Trial Enrollment: A Single-Center Cross-Sectional Survey.ACR open rheumatology · 2026Article
- Patient-Reported Factors Influencing Clinical Trial Participation: An In-depth Analysis of Patients With Lupus and Rheumatoid Arthritis.ACR open rheumatology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveBlack people in the USA have a higher incidence and severity of SLE and worse outcomes, yet they are significantly under-represented in SLE clinical trials. We assessed racial differences in clinical trial perceptions among a large cohort of predominantly Black people with SLE.
methodsGeorgians Organised Against Lupus (GOAL) is a population-based, prospective cohort of people with a validated diagnosis of SLE living in Atlanta. The 2021-2022 GOAL survey included questions assessing knowledge, perceptions and experiences of lupus clinical trials involving drug therapy. Self-reported race was categorised as Black or non-Black. Survey responses by race were compared using χ
resultsA total of 767 individuals responded to the 2021-2022 GOAL survey, of whom 80% were Black. There were 720 female respondents and 47 male respondents. There was no significant difference in willingness to participate in clinical trials between Black and non-Black respondents (28% vs 31%, p=0.071). Black respondents were less likely to correctly identify the definition of a clinical trial (34% vs 70%, p<0.001). Male gender, unemployed or disabled status, governmental health insurance and higher disease activity were associated with willingness to participate in clinical trials among Black respondents.
conclusionsWe found that only 28% of respondents were willing to participate in lupus clinical trials, with no difference by race. Efforts must continue to engage those resistant to trial participation, regardless of race. Our findings also indicate that further research is warranted to assess whether strategies such as clinical trial education and diversification of study staff may be helpful to increase Black patient recruitment. Sociodemographic factors (gender, work status, insurance status) and disease-related factors (lupus activity) may also play important roles in clinical trial participation among Black people.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.