ArticleBMJ open2025
Micronutrient dose response (MiNDR) study among women of reproductive age and pregnant women in rural Bangladesh: study protocol for double-blind, randomised, controlled trials.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effects of vitamin and multiple micronutrient supplementation for pregnant and/or lactating women on maternal and infant nutritional status in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2025Pooled it
- Micronutrient Biomarker Selection and Assay Methods and Performance in Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled Micronutrient Dose Response (MiNDR) Trials among Women of Reproductive Age and Pregnant Women in Rural Bangladesh.Current developments in nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionOptimising the micronutrient status of women before and during reproduction confers benefits to them and their offspring. Antenatal multiple micronutrient supplements (MMS), given as a daily tablet with nutrients at ~1 recommended dietary allowance (RDA) or adequate intake (AI) reduces adverse birth outcomes. However, at this dosage, MMS may not fully address micronutrient deficiencies in settings with chronically inadequate diets and infection. A bioefficacy study to determine amounts required to attain nutrient adequacy among women of reproductive age (WRA) and pregnant women (PW) aims to address this gap. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Two, four-arm, dose-response trials (n=240 participants/trial) with a double-blind, individually randomised, controlled design are underway in 18-35 year-old WRA and PW in rural northern Bangladesh. The trials will test dose response to four levels of 19 micronutrients from 1 RDA/AI up to ~75% of the tolerable upper intake level (UL), where applicable. These levels of micronutrients are delivered in the form of a reconstituted (in water) powdered drink, daily, including a placebo drink in the control arm, plus a fortified, balanced energy and protein (BEP) food product containing each micronutrient at ~1 RDA per serving. The supplement duration is 3 months in WRA and~6 months (until birth) in PW, who are enrolled at 12-16 weeks of pregnancy; women are randomised to one of the four arms at enrolment. Supplement consumption is directly observed by study staff and weekly side effects and adverse events are monitored. Blood and urine are collected at baseline, a midpoint, and at/near the end of supplementation, with a birth visit and postpartum biospecimen collection (post supplementation) for PW. Outcomes are biomarkers of nutrient status. Pharmacokinetic modelling will estimate micronutrient intakes at which sufficiency for each nutrient without excess is achieved. Enrolment was initiated on 22 October 2023. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health and the research and ethical review committees of icddr,b, Bangladesh. A data safety and monitoring board is in place for the study. Findings will be disseminated in peer-reviewed papers and in-country meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06081114Cite Now.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.