Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39755570›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Study protocol for a Prospective Observational study of Safety Threats and Adverse events in Trauma (PrO-STAT): a pilot study at a level-1 trauma centre in Canada.

Anisa Nazir, Melissa McGowan, Eliane M Shore, Charles Keown-Stoneman, Teodor Grantcharov, Brodie Nolan

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anisa NazirInstitute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada anisa.nazir@mail.utoronto.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7871-0753
Melissa McGowanDepartment of Emergency Medicine, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Eliane M ShoreDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Charles Keown-StonemanDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Teodor GrantcharovDepartment of Surgery, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Brodie NolanDepartment of Emergency Medicine, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTraumatic injuries are a significant public health concern globally, resulting in substantial mortality, hospitalisation and healthcare burden. Despite the establishment of specialised trauma centres, there remains considerable variability in trauma-care practices and outcomes, particularly in the initial phase of trauma resuscitation in the trauma bay. This stage is prone to preventable errors leading to adverse events (AEs) that can impact patient outcomes. Prior studies have identified common causes of these errors, including delayed diagnostics, disorganisation of staff, equipment issues and communication breakdowns, which collectively contribute to AEs. This study addresses gaps in understanding the root causes of these errors by evaluating the most frequent AEs in trauma care through real-time video reviews of resuscitations in the trauma bay. Insights from this evaluation will inform targeted interventions to improve procedural adherence, communication and overall team performance, ultimately reducing preventable errors and improving patient safety. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A prospective observational study will be conducted at St. Michael's Hospital, a level-1 trauma centre, to evaluate resuscitations in the trauma bay. All consecutive trauma team activations over 12 months will be included, with data collected using audio-visual recordings and physiological monitoring. A synchronised data capture and analysis platform will comprehensively assess AEs, errors and human and environmental factors during trauma resuscitations. The study aims to detect recurring error patterns, evaluate practice variations and correlate trauma team performance with in-hospital outcomes. Statistical analyses will include descriptive statistics, logistic regression models and multivariable analyses to identify associations and predictors of AEs and patient outcomes. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Institutional research ethics approval was obtained (SMH REB # 21-009). A modified consent model will be employed for participants. Staff, physicians and learners will be provided with information regarding the study and will have the option to opt-out or withdraw consent. Similarly, trauma patients and their next of kin will be informed about the study, with provisions for opting out or withdrawing consent within 48 hours of recording. Measures will be implemented to ensure data confidentiality, anonymity and respect for participants' autonomy and privacy. The study results will be shared through peer-reviewed journal publications and conference presentations, and key institutional stakeholders will be informed about developing strategies to improve patient safety in trauma care.

Indexed as

Medical ErrorsObservational Studies as TopicPatient SafetyResearch DesignTrauma CentersWounds and InjuriesCanadaHumansPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesResuscitationACCIDENT & EMERGENCY MEDICINEAdverse eventsHealth ServicesTraumaTrauma managementTRAUMA MANAGEMENT

Identifiers

PMID39755570
PMCPMC11800214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.