Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39754985›Full record

ArticleESMO open2025

Unraveling the complexity of HRD assessment in ovarian cancer by combining genomic and functional approaches: translational analyses of MITO16-MaNGO-OV-2 trial.

B Pellegrino, E D Capoluongo, M Bagnoli, L Arenare, D Califano, G Scambia, S C Cecere, E M Silini, G L Scaglione, A Spina and 15 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ESMO open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

B PellegrinoMedical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy; Breast Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
E D CapoluongoDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Medical Biotechnology, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Naples, Italy; Department of Clinical Pathology, Azienda Ospedaliera San Giovanni Addolorata, Rome, Italy.
M BagnoliDepartment of Experimental Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy.
L ArenareClinical Trial Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS, Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy.
D CalifanoMicroenvironment Molecular Targets Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS e Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy.
G ScambiaGynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy; Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
S C CecereUro-Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy.
E M SiliniUnit of Pathological Anatomy, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
G L ScaglioneLaboratory of Molecular Oncology, IDI-IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
A SpinaMicroenvironment Molecular Targets Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS e Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy.
G TognonDivision of Obstetrics and Gynecology, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
N CampaniniUnit of Pathological Anatomy, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
C PisanoUro-Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy.
D RussoMicroenvironment Molecular Targets Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS e Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy.
A PettinatoDepartment of Pathological Anatomy, A.O.E. Cannizzaro, Catania, Italy.
P ScolloDivision of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Maternal and Child Department, Cannizzaro Hospital, Kore University of Enna, Enna, Italy.
R IemmoloLaboratory of Genomics, L.C. Laboratori Campisi, Avola, Italy.
L De CeccoDepartment of Experimental Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy.
A MusolinoMedical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy; Breast Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy; Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
S MarchiniCancer Pharmacology Lab, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy.
L BeltrameCancer Pharmacology Lab, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy.
L ParacchiniCancer Pharmacology Lab, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy.
F PerroneClinical Trial Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS, Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy.
D MezzanzanicaDepartment of Experimental Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy.
S PignataUro-Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy. Electronic address: s.pignata@istitutotumori.na.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOvarian cancer (OvC) constitutes significant management challenges primarily due to its late-stage diagnosis and the development of resistance to chemotherapy. The standard treatment regimen typically includes carboplatin and paclitaxel, with the addition of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors for patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) harboring BRCA1/2 mutations. However, the variability in treatment responses suggests the need to investigate factors beyond BRCA1/2 mutations, such as DNA repair mechanisms and epigenetic alterations. Notably, homologous recombination repair deficiency (HRD) is observed in an additional 20% of HGSOC cases, indicating a broader spectrum of DNA repair defects. Existing commercial HRD assays have certain limitations, prompting a global effort to develop new genomic and functional tests through academic research. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis study investigates, in the 187 high-grade serous and endometrioid tumors from the MITO16/MaNGO-OV-2 trial, academic HRD genomic tests in conjunction with a RAD51 immunofluorescence assay to assess functional activation of HRD. Additionally, the study incorporates analysis of microRNA-506 (miR-506) expression as a putative epigenetic effector.

resultsThe RAD51 test identified HRD in 73% of the samples and genomic HRD testing in 57%, with HRD identified in 45% of samples by both tests. The significant discrepancy between the two assays emphasizes the need to refine tumor classification for HRD. A three-group genomic classification unveiled superior progression-free survival (PFS) in high- and mild-HRD tumors compared with negative-HRD tumors. High concordance between RAD51 and genomic testing in high-HRD tumors suggests a subset of 'super-HRD' tumors exhibiting superior PFS. High expression of miR-506 may be used to further refine HRD status.

conclusionsThe study underscores the complexities of HRD assessment and advocates for a combined genomic and functional approach to enhance predictive accuracy in OvC treatment responses.

Indexed as

Ovarian NeoplasmsRecombinational DNA RepairFemaleGenomicsHumansMiddle AgedTranslational Research, BiomedicalHRDmiR-506ovarian cancerRAD51

Identifiers

PMID39754985
PMCPMC11758122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.