ArticleESMO open2025
Survival analysis of the non-metastatic cohort of the Italian Association for Medical Oncology (AIOM) Guideline Application in Real world: multi-Institutional Based survey of Adjuvant and first-Line pancreatic Ductal adenocarcinoma treatment in Italy (GARIBALDI).
Article in ESMO open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Updates in the diagnosis and management of ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas.World journal of clinical oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNon-metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) presents a challenging scenario: the rarity of the disease, the limited number of completed prospective trials, and the shortcomings of comparability across series produce several controversial topics and unanswered questions. Guideline recommendations usually include all the different therapeutic options, de facto transferring to the multidisciplinary team the responsibility on the final decision. This secondary analysis of the GARIBALDI study was aimed to explore the correlation of center type, self-declared volume, and commitment with the overall survival (OS) in patients with non-metastatic PDAC. PATIENTS AND
methodsTreatment-naïve patients aged ≥18 years with a pathological diagnosis of non-metastatic PDAC, enrolled between July 2017 and October 2019, were analyzed. OS was defined as the time from treatment start to death. The impact of centers and clinical-demographic characteristics on OS was evaluated using Cox models.
resultsOverall, 402 patients enrolled in 41 centers were eligible for this analysis. The median age was 68.4 years (range 35.6-88.8 years), 49.5% were females, 93.5% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-1, 16.7% had prior cancer history, and the median CA 19-9 level was 171.5 IU/ml (first-third quartile 24.5-937.5 IU/ml). For 79.8% of patients treatment started within 1 month from diagnosis. Thirty six point six percent of patients underwent upfront surgery and 91.8% of these received a subsequent adjuvant chemotherapy; 14.2% received chemotherapy followed by surgery and 49.3% chemotherapy without surgery. The preferred chemotherapy schemes were gemcitabine (54.8%) for adjuvant chemotherapy and nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine (55.3%) for upfront chemotherapy. The median follow-up was 57.6 months and 300 patients died. A statistically significant shorter OS was observed in both low- [hazard ratio (HR) 1.61, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.12-2.32, P = 0.0099] and medium-commitment (HR 1.57, 95% CI 1.10-2.23, P = 0.0120) compared to high-commitment institutions, when adjusting for clinically relevant covariates.
conclusionThe GARIBALDI study suggests that the volume and the academic brand are not associated with OS in patients with non-metastatic PDAC, while center commitment warrants further exploration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.