Trial reportESMO open2025
Ten-year update of HOBOE phase III trial comparing triptorelin plus either tamoxifen or letrozole or zoledronic acid + letrozole in premenopausal hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer patients.
Trial report in ESMO open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00412022 (Phase III Randomized Study of the Effects on Bone Mineral Density of Tamoxifen, Letrozole, and Letrozole + Zoledronic Acid as Adjuvant Treatment of Patients With Early Breast Cancer; VERSION 2 AMENDED Phase 3 Study of Triptorelin and Tamoxifen, Letrozole, or Letrozole + Zoledronic Acid in Adjuvant Treatment of Premenopausal Endocrine Responsive Breast Cancer Patients.), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Phase III Randomized Study of the Effects on Bone Mineral Density of Tamoxifen, Letrozole, and Letrozole + Zoledronic Acid as Adjuvant Treatment of Patients With Early Breast Cancer; VERSION 2 AMENDED Phase 3 Study of Triptorelin and Tamoxifen, Letrozole, or Letrozole + Zoledronic Acid in Adjuvant Treatment of Premenopausal Endocrine Responsive Breast Cancer Patients.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effectiveness and safety of bone protective interventions to mitigate bone loss and skeletal fractures experienced by patients with non-metastatic breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026Pooled it
- Article
- Ovarian Function Suppression in Premenopausal Hormone Receptor-Positive Early Breast Cancer: A Comprehensive Review.Journal of breast cancer · 2026Review
- Bone protection in breast cancer: durability and discontinuation.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026Article
- Tailoring targeted therapies for younger women with ER-positive early-stage breast cancer.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026Review
- BOne HEalth ManagEment in Patients with Early Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Italian Osteoncology Center "Real-Life" Experience (BOHEME Study).Journal of clinical medicine · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
27 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Hormonal Bone Effects (HOBOE) study tested whether adjuvant triptorelin plus either letrozole (L) or zoledronic acid (Z) plus L (ZL) was more effective than tamoxifen (T) in premenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) early breast cancer (BC). Here we report the long-term follow-up analysis. PATIENTS AND
methodsHOBOE (ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT00412022) is an open-label, three-arm, randomised, phase III trial that involved 16 centres in Italy. One thousand and sixty-five premenopausal patients with HR+ early BC receiving triptorelin were randomly assigned (1 : 1 : 1) to adjuvant T, L or ZL for 5 years. Cancer recurrence, second breast or non-breast cancer and death were considered events for the intention-to-treat disease-free survival (DFS) analysis.
resultsAs of 24 October 2024 at a median follow-up of 9.2 years, 199 DFS events and 79 deaths were reported. Both ZL and L improved DFS over T, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.58 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.41-0.82; P = 0.002] for ZL versus T and 0.69 (95% CI 0.49-0.97, P = 0.030) for L versus T. No statistically significant difference in OS was reported (global log-rank P = 0.103). The previously reported statistically significant interaction with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status was confirmed for ZL versus T comparison (P = 0.007).
conclusionIn this updated analysis, L plus triptorelin, with or without Z, demonstrated a statistically significant DFS improvement over T plus triptorelin for the adjuvant treatment of early BC in premenopausal patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.