ArticleCancer genetics2025
Analysis of nuclear receptor expression in head and neck cancer.
Article in Cancer genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveStudies of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC) have demonstrated the importance of nuclear receptors and their associated coregulators in the development and treatment of HNSCC. We sought to characterize members of the nuclear receptor super family through interrogation of RNA-Seq and microarray data. MATERIALS AND
methodsTCGA RNA-Seq data within the cBioportal platform comparing HNSCC samples (n = 515 patients with RNA-Seq data) to normal tissue (n = 82 patients) was interrogated for significant differences in nuclear receptor expression. Affymetrix microarray analysis of HNSCC tumors relative to normal oral mucosa (41 tumor, 13 normal) was analyzed.
resultsOf the 48 NR genes and 19 NR cofactors examined, 99 % of tumor samples in the TCGA had some form of NR gene 'alteration' compared to normal tissue. These alterations predominantly encompass expression changes. NR genes (PPARG) and (RORC), and the NR cofactor, (NCOA1), were differentially expressed and downregulated in tumors compared to normal tissue.
conclusionWe have discovered significant decreases in PPARG expression with co-occurring changes in genes involved with lipid metabolism and cell cycle progression in HNSCC. We are targeting PPARγ with thiazolidinediones in a series of clinical trials to restore normal signaling via differentiation to hopefully reverse carcinogenesis. We also observed several receptors with differential expression associated with clinical factors that may become the focus of interest in future targeting efforts. These data provide evidence for nuclear receptors playing a role in the dysregulation of gene expression in HNSCC and illustrate the utility of current bioinformatic tools for interrogating complex, high throughput data sets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.