Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39754747›Full record

ArticleMicrosurgery2025

Reconstruction of Abdominal Defects After Open Abdomen Treatment Using Propeller Flaps of the Superior and Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery System: Report of Two Cases.

Martin C Lam, Andreas Henkel, Lisa Greber, Martin W von Websky, Jörg C Kalff, Klaus J Walgenbach

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Microsurgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Clinical outcomes in abdominal wall autologous flap reconstruction: a systematic review.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Martin C LamDivision of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4073-7379
Andreas HenkelDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Lisa GreberDivision of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Martin W von WebskyDepartment of General, Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Jörg C KalffDepartment of General, Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Klaus J WalgenbachDivision of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Open abdomen treatment (OAT) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. In cases where primary or delayed fascial closure cannot be achieved, vacuum-assisted wound closure and mesh-mediated fascial traction are indicated, which often result in a planned ventral hernia. If secondary skin closure is not feasible, common treatment of granulated abdominal defects involves split-thickness skin-grafting or healing by secondary intention leading to significant scarring and sometimes mutilating defects. Late enteroatmospheric fistulae may develop as a result of instable scar tissue or insufficient soft tissue coverage. Perforator propeller flaps have been described for reconstruction of soft tissue defects of the abdomen; however, not for OAT-induced abdominal defects. We report two complex cases of OAT-induced abdominal wall defects of 20 × 8 and 22 × 10 cm, which were reconstructed with a propeller flap based on the superior epigastric artery perforator in the first case and the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator in the second case. The flaps were rotated into each of the abdominal defects following the propeller flap concept with primary closure of the donor sites and successful reconstruction of both defects. At 1-year follow-up, both patients developed asymptomatic incisional ventral hernias. Secondary-stage abdominal wall reconstruction was not considered due to satisfaction with the reconstructive result and feared complications. Pedicled perforator flaps designed based on either the superior or deep inferior epigastric artery system are useful reconstructive options for midline abdominal defects without necessity for pedicle lengthening, microsurgical anastomosis, or another donor site beyond the abdomen. In conclusion, soft tissue coverage of OAT-induced abdominal defects in critically ill patients can be achieved with the presented propeller flaps avoiding poor results of skin grafting or secondary intention healing.

Indexed as

Abdominal WallEpigastric ArteriesPerforator FlapPlastic Surgery ProceduresAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOpen Abdomen Techniquesabdominal wall reconstructionopen abdomenpedicled deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flappedicled superior epigastric artery perforator (SEAP) flappropeller flaps

Identifiers

PMID39754747
PMCPMC11699969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.